For staffing agencies and search firms

An ATS built for a staffing desk,
not an HR department.

Most applicant tracking systems are built around one employer filling its own openings. A staffing desk inverts that. You run many clients at once, your unit of work is the submittal, you are paid on a fee tied to a salary, and the candidates you find are your asset long after the role closes. SourcingNav is an applicant tracking system for recruiting agencies that is shaped that way from the database up, with candidate sourcing built into the same product instead of sold as a second seat.

No credit card. Solo $99/month, Team $349/month for up to five seats. You keep 100% of every placement fee.

The mismatch nobody names on the demo call

In-house recruiting software and staffing software solve different problems. When an agency runs on an HR-shaped ATS, the gaps are not features you can turn on. They are assumptions baked into the data model.

What the desk runs onAn in-house ATS assumesSourcingNav assumes
The employer One company. It is the constant in every screen. Many clients. Every role hangs off the client it belongs to, and each client can have its own careers page.
The unit of work An application that arrived at the company. A submittal you send to a client, tracked through the stages that follow it.
How you get paid Nothing. The recruiter is on salary. A fee percentage and a salary on the role, so the desk can be read in dollars, not in req counts.
Who owns the candidate The company's pipeline. The person exists relative to one req. You do. People stay on your bench after the role closes and get matched against the next one.
Where candidates come from Inbound applicants and a job board spend. A search you run. Sourcing is inside the ATS, not a separate tool with its own login and invoice.

What a staffing desk actually needs

Everything below is in the product today. Nothing on this page is a roadmap item.

Many clients

Roles live under the client

Every role belongs to a client organization, so the desk is readable by account rather than as one flat list of reqs. Each client can have its own careers page for the roles you are working.

The submittal

Submittals, not applications

Sending a shortlist to a client is a first-class action with its own record, and the stages that follow it live on the same pipeline the sourcing fed.

The money

Fees on the role, not in a spreadsheet

Fee percentage and estimated salary sit on the role itself, so pipeline value and placement revenue come out of the same system that holds the work.

The bench

A database that outlives the req

People you sourced, screened or passed stay on your bench, tagged from what their resume actually says rather than from their job title, and get matched against the next role you open.

Warm paths

The desk remembers who knows whom

When someone on your bench shares an employer with one of your connections, the card says so, and the outreach draft can open with a named introduction instead of a cold line.

Sourcing built in

One product, not a stack

Paste a job description and the system reads the skills that matter, builds the searches, runs them against the public web search index, and scores every candidate it finds.

Evidence

A receipt behind every verdict

Each score carries the evidence that produced it, and a rejection cannot be recorded without a reason written as a sentence. A month later, you can still say why.

Outreach

Mail that sends as you

Connect Outlook or Gmail and outreach goes out from your own address, with replies landing back on the candidate record instead of in a separate sequencing tool.

On the profile

Build a record without retyping

A Chrome extension reads the profile page you already have open and turns it into a record on your desk, with the resume attached and its skills searchable.

The Greenhouse question, answered straight

Agencies ask whether SourcingNav connects to Greenhouse, Ashby or Lever. It does not, and that is a decision rather than a gap. A connector makes your desk a satellite of whatever system already owns your client's data, and the candidates you worked hardest to find end up living in someone else's database. SourcingNav is the system of record for your side of the deal. Job descriptions paste in from any ATS in seconds, and your candidates, verdicts and notes come out as text and CSV whenever you want them.

What this page is not claiming

  • There are no ATS or HRIS connectors, by design. If a client requires you to work inside their system, you will still be working inside their system.
  • There is no e-signature integration yet, and no date is promised for one.
  • Back-office payroll, timesheets and invoicing for contract placements are not part of the product.
  • Candidate search runs on the public web search index. You still open profiles yourself, in your own browser.

Priced for a desk, not a department

Every plan starts with a 14-day free trial and no credit card. SourcingNav never takes a percentage of a placement fee.

Solo
$99 /month

The whole platform for one recruiting desk. The right fit for an independent recruiter or a one-person search firm.

Team
$349 /month

Up to five seats in one workspace, under $70 a seat. Built for a small recruitment agency running several desks against shared clients.

Trial
$0 /14 days

The full engine with sensible usage limits. Enough to take real roles from job description to submitted candidates before you decide.

Questions agencies ask

What makes an ATS for staffing agencies different from a normal ATS?

An in-house applicant tracking system is built around one employer filling its own openings, so the company is a constant and the candidate belongs to that company's pipeline. A staffing desk inverts both. You run many clients at once, your unit of work is the submittal rather than the application, you are paid on a fee tied to a salary, and your candidates are your asset across every client you will ever work with. SourcingNav models roles under the client they belong to, tracks fee percentage and salary on the role, and keeps every person on a bench that outlives the role that found them.

Does SourcingNav integrate with Greenhouse, Ashby or Lever?

No, and that is deliberate. SourcingNav is the system of record for your desk: sourcing, outreach, pipeline, interviews, offers and placements in one place. A connector would make your desk a satellite of whatever system owns your client's data. Job descriptions paste in from any ATS, and candidates, verdicts and notes export as text and CSV.

Do I need a separate sourcing tool or a LinkedIn Recruiter seat?

No separate sourcing seat is required. Candidate search runs on the public web search index from inside the same product that holds your pipeline, so a hunt and the record it produces are the same system. You still open profiles yourself in your own browser, and a Chrome extension reads the profile page you already have open so the record is built without retyping.

Is SourcingNav suitable for a solo recruiter or a small recruitment agency?

Yes. Solo is $99 per month for one desk and Team is $349 per month for up to five seats, which is under $70 a seat. Every plan starts with a 14-day free trial and no credit card. SourcingNav takes no percentage of your placement fees.

What happens to my candidates if I stop paying?

Nothing is deleted. Your roles, candidates, pipeline and outreach history stay where they are and stay readable. The engine stops doing new resource-burning work such as intakes, searches and evaluations until you upgrade again.

Run your desk on software shaped like your desk.

Paste a job description and watch it become a shortlist. Fourteen days, no credit card, no call with a sales engineer.

Paste your first role